Tubeless- more data

 The testing continues – and though there are still some issues I am pretty certain I will not be buying tubulars for next year. Here is a quick run-down of the “testing” since early October – with a bit of rationale to help explain what does and does not work well. 

Turkey cross- Dura-ace wheels around 40 PSI no problems. Picked the Dura-Ace because they are lighter, roll better and there was no compelling reason on that day for really low pressure.

 

The following week the bike and I took a trip to Portland Oregon for “work”. I really did make it to a bunch of meetings and a conference. But I also found time to:

 
  1. Ride the cross bike up into the Coastal Mountains outside Corvallis (very low mountains by local standards- less than 500 meters of elevation gain) on gravel roads and a bit of o so smooooooooth Oregon single track. What goes up must come down – and in this case down fast- very fast.
  2. Go for a pair of rides in Forest Park in Portland. About 20K of gravel road that is closed to cars located in the trees above the city. The road was a rolling, twisty mud-pit – it was also pretty rough for gravel roads- at least by Southern Ontario standards.
  3. Race in a Cross-Crusade race. Lots of climbing – and no mud on a course that was pretty bumpy.
 

I brought the Dura-Ace wheels – mainly because  knew that I was going to be going on some long rides- alone and in the case of the Corvallis ride - far from traffic and cell phone coverage. The thought of spending an hour wrestling the tires off the Mavics if I got a flat was not high on my list of vacation plans. I did not bring a floor pump so I filled the tires to 40 PSI when I left home, and did not touch them for the trip. Everything was flawless. I also talked to a bunch of people in Portland running all sorts of tubeless set-ups – and most were very happy.

 

Kelso – day 1 the mud-fest. Finally time to race the Mavics. Ran just under 35 PSI and they worked pretty well. No burping, no air-loss and better traction than I would have had with the Dura-Ace set-up.

 

Kelso Day 2 and Barrie- Back to the Dura-ace wheels- they are just plain faster if there is traction – and then there is the stopping – obviously an issue unique to my rig but the Dura-Ace rims are a bit wider and up front they work much better with my brakes than the Mavics. Both days trouble free.

 

Toronto Day 1. I pre-rode on the Dura-ace and was doing fine on the flat sections but the short climbs sucked- so I switched to the Mavic on the rear and kept the Dura-Ace up front. Ran about 30 PSI in the back maybe a tad less? Much better traction getting up the short steep stuff – and the front end was fine. Again both wheels ended up at the same PSI as they started and no problems.

 

Toronto Day 2-same set-up as the day before. Did not add air to the tires from the day before – hell it was hard enough to get the bike clean enough to shift properly. And again no trouble. The rear end hooked up great. On the steep climbs I was able to stand and put down full power with only occasional slippage – and I was passing people on the hills who were having all sorts of trouble. And I think the higher pressure up front created at least the sensation of more control on the way down. Was it as good as Tim Johnson’s set-up? I doubt it. But it was way better than clinchers.

 

So here is what I know at nearly the end of the season (say it ain’t so!!). First, the Dura-Ace set-up has been trouble free but only if I keep the PSI above 35 – and probably best above 38. So for really crap conditions you can not run the pressure you would want with the Dura-Ace – but it is better than clinchers with far less likelihood of flatting / blowing-up at similar PSI.   And speaking to others with the same wheel and tire combination you usually get the same response – it works but I don’t trust them much below 40 PSI.

 

The converted Mavics on the other hand seem to be fine at pressures that put the rim at risk of being dented. I can not imagine running any lower pressure than I ran this weekend. But I also know that the tires are on so tight that getting a flat would suck- so they are fine for racing but not for much else.  Based on my data gathering in Portland people who are using something other than the Hutchinson tires don’t have this issue with conversions so at some point over the winter I will mount something else on these rims and see what happens. And Stan’s has finally brought out their tubeless cross tire which looks pretty sweet – so that might be another good option.

 

I will post final thoughts at the end of the season  - if I have any. But for now I would suggest that tubeless seems like a viable solution but don’t bother with the Dura-ace wheels. But just in case please refrain from passing me – because it is still an experiment.

  

Mark, it was good talking to

Mark, it was good talking to you at the TN shop the other day. I'll add my tubeless data here: Wheelset 1: Ksyrium Equipe wheels converted with 1 layer velox tape, 1 layer stans yellow tape (25mm wide) and stans road tubeless valves. Tires are Michelin Mud2. Wheelset 2: FiR SDG30 rims with Stan's CX strips, Hutchinson Bulldog tires. The Ksyrium setup has been more reliable - I run them between 33-40 psi (@190 lbs) and never a catastrophic event even with lots of rim to ground contact. At the lower end of that pressure range, I can burp the rear on heavy off-camber corners, but never to the point where I can't keep riding. The other wheels were an experiment in how the Stan's strip compared to the DIY approach. They were about as reliable, but I did have more burping issues which I think was partly because the large Bulldogs put more lateral forces on the bead since they are so much wider than the rim. This setup went to shit one day on a trail ride when I burped enough air that I needed to inflate to continue - with a mini-pump. The pump tore the valvestem partially out of the stan's strip, and I had to walk out. Stan's doesn't cover this kind of failure because mini-pumps have a tendency to do this. I agree, but what else was I supposed to do at the time. I retired the Stan's strips and now race on tubulars or the Ksyrium/Mud2 setup. Overall, I'm not convinced that at my weight they will ever match the performance of tubulars. I don't think any setup will really be capable of holding a bead at 30 psi or less. I have Stan's rims on my mtb, and they've been very good. I think using the notubes 355 rim, or the soon to be released ZTR Race rims would be a big improvement, but at their cost and the need to be built at low spoke tensions, I'd sooner have a more durable pair of tubular wheels and deal with gluing tires, sealing sidewalls, etc.

JMoote and Jon (last post)

JMoote and Jon (last post)  bring up a good point – my weight – because that obviously plays a role in all of this. So I weight about 155- probably a bit less during the cross season. Not a surprise then that the bigger guys have to run higher pressure. But I assume the benefits I get at 40 PSI they get at a slightly higher pressure? And of course this entire discussion assumes we all have accurate and precise air pressure gauges.


Agreed... but I question the

Agreed... but I question the "benefits" of 40 psi for you at 155. That sounds high to me, even if I was running tubes in clinchers. If I weighed what you do I'd be looking at sub 30 no doubt. That's what I like about tubulars - glued well, even a heavy guy like me can run low 30s and not worry about anything.

Thanks for the info on the

Thanks for the info on the tubeless. Has anyone used the Stans setup in cold (minus) temps, have the necessary bits to build up a set , but will this stuff hold a seal with the temps forecast for Sun??

J – Prior to this year I

J – Prior to this year I raced Mud2’s on open pro rims. By my tire gauge anything much under 45 PSI unless the course was really smooth was risky. So with the Dura-Ace wheels I can run 5-10 PSI less than the clinchers – which is a huge difference. And I can run 30 PSI in the Krsyriums (sp?) no problem.  My only worry then is denting the rim not the tire burping.  So you might want to try the Bulldogs on your other rims? Not arguing that tubeless is better than tubular- just noting that it is a big improvement over clinchers. And I am also betting on the technology improving – I bet the Stan’s tires on Stan’s rims work real well.

Peter – The last few weeks at Centennial Park have been cold- last night was really cold – and no apparent problems.   That said I am not sure I would race on a new set-up  on Sunday unless you have a few chances to play with it since it is clear that the experience varies for each of us.  


My impression of the

My impression of the bulldogs at say 45 psi is that they are better than most any other clincher setup, and still better than a lot of the sew ups.  I think I'll stick to some better quality tubulars next year, but I'll break out the tubeless when the course looks like it has the potential to rip a tire.

I got the new Vittoria tires, the better quality Evo models, they look really nice and are quite light.  I'm already looking forward to next season.

 

John Roden West Falls, NY


It seems to me a different

It seems to me a different web having information about riding bicycles...There are certainly many different posts at here...actually i was surfing net toget data related to the projects of testking pmp , RCDD , 1z0-147 and in the meantime came here and find this post different one this is the reason why i couldn't stop myself to comment on it!

He then sought to develop

He then sought to develop one universal mental online marketing structure that could only be inferred through the systematic comparison of particular social and cultural structures. He argued that just as there are laws through which a finite and relatively small number of chemical elements could be combined to create a seemingly infinite variety of things, there voip were a finite and relatively small number of cultural elements which people combine to create the great variety of cultures anthropologists observe. The systematic comparison of societies would enable an anthropologist to develop this cultural "table of elements," and once completed, this table of cultural elements would enable an anthropologist to online payments analyze specific cultures and achieve insights hidden to the very people who produced and lived through these cultures. Structuralism came to dominate French anthropology dsl and, in the late 1960s and 1970s, came to have great influence on American and British anthropology.